The Anti-BDS Derangement Syndrome

Democrat Ben Cardin, a senator from Maryland and a ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is determined to sneak through anti-BDS legislation during the lame duck session of Congress. 

Most Americans are either ignorant or vaguely aware of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions aimed at Israel for its criminal treatment of the Palestinians. This is because the movement is scantily covered by the corporate propaganda media, but also because millions of Americans couldn’t care less what happens to the Palestinians, even though the Israeli military and its ethnic cleansing program are funded in large part by their tax dollars.

Liberty is dead in America. Prior to the American Revolution, the colonies boycotted British goods. In 1774, the First Continental Congress called for a boycott and this was enforced by new committees authorized by the Congress.

Boycotts are legend—from Gandhi organizing a boycott of British goods to the bus boycotts in Montgomery and Tallahassee during the Civil Rights movement. The predecessors of today’s Zionists used a boycott to stop the importation of German products in the US, Britain, Poland, and Mandatory Palestine. Additionally, Jews imposed a boycott on Henry Ford in the 1920s. 

All of that is largely forgotten, mostly because Americans don’t do history and their political understanding is sculpted and curtailed by the state and its propaganda media. The corporate media has managed to portray BDS as rabid antisemitism. 

But then, in America and especially Europe, any criticism of the Israeli apartheid state is considered a form of hatred—more egregious than all other hatred—that leads ultimately to the gates of Auschwitz. 

The anti-BDS push has thus far infected 25 states. In 2017, this mania and support for the international renegade state of Israel resulted in a city in Texas requiring businesses to certify that they would not boycott Israel before receiving hurricane aid.

Ryan Grim and Alex Emmons write that the “Israel Anti-Boycott Act, which was introduced last year by Cardin and Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, would amend the 1979 Export Administration Act to allow penalties for companies who join boycotts of Israel called for by international institutions—like the United Nations or the European Union. The new version clarifies that people cannot face jail time for participating in a boycott, but the ACLU has argued that it still leaves the door open for criminal financial penalties. Defenders of the bill say that it is strictly aimed at preventing companies from facing pressure to boycott Israel and that it is not meant to restrict an individual’s free speech.”

Eradicating the First Amendment comes in second to protecting Israel and its slow-motion ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. If you criticize Israel for its repeated violations of international law, you will face harassment—as I discovered back in the late 2000s. I received death threats and harassing phone calls at my place of employment at that time for the crime of taking the little apartheid state to task on my blog.  

At one point, an email arrived with an image attachment—my face photoshopped on the body of Julius Streicher, the founder and publisher of Der Stürmer, a Nazi newspaper. Streicher was one of the most virulent antisemites of the Nazi party. He was executed at Nuremberg. This sort of nasty and hysterical behavior is what critics of Israel face on a regular basis. 

If Cardin manages to attach his anti-liberty amendment to S. 720, an end-of-the-year omnibus spending bill, this will further embolden supporters of Israel to not only criminalize free speech, but physically go after critics. 

creatdive commons by-sa_RGB-350x122

Go to Source
Author: Kurt Nimmo


Lies and Character Assassination in the War to Destroy the First Amendment

Now that the corporate state has decided to destroy any social network not on the reservation, we are seeing a spate of stories attacking the founder of Gab, Andrew Tobra. 

Meanwhile, according to the attorney general of Pennsylvania, the First Amendment begets “hate crimes.”

After the propaganda media successfully pegged Steve Bannon as something akin to a Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard, the Canadian leftist org LeadNow called for Bannon’s free speech to be shut down. 

LeadNow’s website says its mission is “a more open, accountable, and representative democracy,” but this doesn’t apply to Steve Bannon or anyone to the right of Justin Trudeau. 

Jeffrey Scott Shapiro, a former DC prosecutor who worked with Bannon, emphatically declared last year the former Trump strategist is not a racist. Shapiro, who is Jewish, described Bannon’s philosophy as “egalitarian America First.” Bannon said he has “zero tolerance” for “racist or anti-Semitic views.” 

For the corporatist media and the state, however, America First is code for racist, sexist, and generally belligerent, possibly even violent and terroristic thoughtcrimes. 

Remarkably, this surrealistic rearrangement of reality and logic is accepted by millions of Americans. It will be a determinate next Tuesday. 

creatdive commons by-sa_RGB-350x122

Go to Source
Author: Kurt Nimmo

Cesar Sayoc and Free Will

Can words spoken or tweeted by Donald Trump incite violence?

In the current Bizarro world of American politics words are no different than pipe bombs. 

The decision of an individual to kill has nothing to do with words spoken or written by other people. When an individual commits a violent act, that individual alone is responsible. 

As president, Trump has the ability to influence millions of people. However, listeners are responsible for their subjective processing of his words and how they react to them. There is no such thing as incitement. The individual decides if he or she will act on the words of others. It’s called free will. 

I believe the rising hysteria to curtail political speech will put a new emphasis on the campaign to deplatform alternative media. 

creatdive commons by-sa_RGB-350x122

Go to Source
Author: Kurt Nimmo