Until the Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama, race relations in this country were on the mend. They had been for years and years. On the mend so much that a majority of non African American citizens actually voted, not once, but twice to elect a dark skinned person to the Presidency.
Race relations in this country are not mending anymore, sadly.
There is constant bombardment from every media angle attacking whites. Attempting to draw African Americans together in hatred and anger and jealousy; the Overlords have managed to exclude every other potential race lumping them all into the white category showing their inherent racism.
That does not harm the non African American population. It harms those it has been exploiting ever since Democrats owned slaves.
A once respected organization trashes its mission statement and engages in sexism and intellectual fraud to shield Hillary Clinton from scrutiny.
Once upon a time, MuckRock was a respected organization that made its name with FOIA requests touting that MuckRock was,
Your essential weekly guide to the latest on FOIA, transparency and accountability battles, threats and wins.
So how do we explain their sudden and complete capitulation to Hillary Clinton, which evicerates their stated mission? Is this merely another form of TDS or something far more pervasive?
This morning, MuckRock sent an email with the intellectual fraud of late, attempting to correlate Hillary Clinton’s criminal violation of installing a completely separated and completely secret server system in the basement of a private home, to Melania Trump using her personal email to conduct her business.
The fact that MuckRock just fell right into the mysoginist 101 playbook , “any vagina is interchangeable with any other vagina” aside for a moment, let’s look at the intellectual fraud they are trying to perpetrate.
Hillary Clinton was a paid government worker who installed an entire, self-contained server system that she kept secret from the public -in the basement of a private home- to conduct top secret and classified intelligence work via that server system rather than her appointed government email. This means all of the work done on that separate, self contained server system is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
The fact that all of Hillary Clinton’s government work was done on a server not subject to FOIA -MuckRock’s claim to fame- might be the largest elephant in any room in MuckRock’s house.
The First Lady of the United States (FLOTUS) is whoever is married to the President. FLOTUS has no consequence to national security, deals with no intelligence information, no classified materials, no government work whatsoever, and has zero obligation to use a government appointed email in any way, shape or form.
FLOTUS may use any communication she likes, since it’s not a real job, she collects no salary, and has no work for the government.
FLOTUS is not a job.
That MuckRock would fraudulently link these two things in an attempt to white wash the actual crimes of a Secretary of State who set up an entire, self contained server system to avoid FOIA, discredits MuckRock on its own mission statement.
The Mysoginy of MuckRock
How can an organization like MuckRock engage in the basic sexist and misogynistic behavior of thinking one can simply interchange anyone with a vagina? It’s one step away from suggesting that any black man is comparable to any other black man, simply because he is also black. Reducing a person to their skin color is racism in the same way that reducing a person to their sex organs is sexist.
Any vagina doing any role in the government is now interchangeable and comparable to any other role held by a vagina?
The woman married to the President, and the SECRETARY OF STATE have no relationship whatsoever, other than the fact that Melania has a vagina and Hillary has a vagina.
The fact that FLOTUS has a vagina and Hillary has a vagina is the connection MuckRock is promoting and advertising between the two things. And, they are using that as the reasoning to excuse illegal behavior because if one vagina did something, this affects all other vaginas regardless of the law.
This is what MuckRock is now trying to sell you.
How can anyone claiming to be touting “transparency and accountability“-rationally, morally or ethically defend such intellectually fraudulent behavior?
Need any more evidence this “pandemic” is nothing more than a social experiment?
Behold the TEST MARKETING IN NEW YORK as of last week. FocusGroups.org sent out to its test marketing audience the following survey, and in a twist everyone can see coming, the connection between COVID, Mail in Voting, and hating Trump could not be more clear.
If you ever felt like your reality is one big social experiment to see what you’ll do, think, feel, and how you’ll inevitably VOTE, then you were right on the money. Literally.
Marketing Surveys cost money. Marketing Companies get paid to launch them. It makes one wonder who the client is.
With the Saturday arrest of billionaire financier Jeffrey Epstein on charges of sex-trafficking minors – days after a judge ordered that nearly 2,000 documents be made public following a 2017 court motion originally brought by filmmaker and author Mike Cernovich, the internet is once again abuzz with speculation over who exactly might be implicated by the new evidence.
Epstein pleaded guilty to one count of soliciting prostitution from a 14 year old girl in 2008 for which he served 13 months in jail in a sweetheart deal with the DOJ brokered by current Labor Secretary Alex Acosta. The sealed records appeal, meanwhile, stemmed from a separate 2015 defamation lawsuit in New York brought by Epstein victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell. Giuffre says Maxwell helped Epstein traffic herself and other underage girls to sex parties at the billionaire pedophile’s many residences.
The case was settled in 2017 and the records were sealed – leading to an appeal by Cernovich, who was later joined by the Miami Herald and several other parties including lawyer Alan Dershowitz – who seeks to clear his name in connection with Epstein’s activities.
And while Democrats have suggested that the new evidence may implicate President Trump – who once called Epstein a “Terrific guy” who “likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side” (yet reportedly kicked the billionaire pedophile out of his Mar-a-Lago club for trying to recruit an underage girl) others are focusing on the Clintons.
A the NY Post detailed in 2016, Epstein and the Clintons are close.
Epstein has spent the bulk of his adult life cultivating relationships with the worlds most powerful men. Flight logs show that from 2001 to 2003, Bill Clinton flew on Epsteins private plane, dubbed The Lolita Express by the press, 26 times. After Epsteins arrest in July 2006, federal tax records show Epstein donated $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation that year.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s Superdelegate daughter Christine quipped on Twitter “It is quite likely thatsome of our faves are implicated but we must follow the facts and let the chips fall where they may.”
And what about Trump?
Following a 2018 financial settlement between Florida attorney Bradley Edwards – who represented one of Epstein’s accusers, only to be later sued by Epstein, Edwards claimed that Donald Trump was the ‘only person’ who provided assistance when Edwards served subpoenas and notices to high-profile individuals connected to Epstein.
Edwards: The only thing that I can say about President Trump is that he is the only person who, in 2009 when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people, or at least gave notice to some pretty connected people, that I want to talk to them, is the only person who picked up the phone and said, let’s just talk. I’ll give you as much time as you want. I’ll tell you what you need to know, and was very helpful, in the information that he gave, and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information. That checked out and that helped us and we didn’t have to take a deposition of him in 2009.
NEVER MISS THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST
ZEROHEDGE DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX
Receive a daily recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.
While trying to tie Trump to Epstein in an attempt to push the narrative to at least two reporters, Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS – the firm behind the unsubstantiated “Trump-Russia” dossier, found that the Trump-Epstein link appears purely social, according to the Washington Times, which writes “Journalist sources told The Washington Times that Simpson pushed the idea of a close relationship between Mr. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein,” adding “Ken Silverstein, the reporter who ultimately wrote an Epstein-Trump report, confirmed to The Times that Fusion had sourced the story.”
Mr. Silverstein, who wrote the Vice.Com story, was asked by The Washington Times if Fusion pushed the Epstein-Trump story.
Since you asked, yes, they helped me with that, Mr. Silverstein said. But as you can see, I could not make a strong case for Trump being super close to Epstein, so they could hardly have been thrilled with that story. [In my humble opinion], that was the best story written about Trumps ties to Epstein, but I failed to nail him. Trumps ties were mild compared to Bill Clintons. –Washington Times
In January 2016, Vice.com ran Silverstein’s story on Trump’s ties to Epstein, which framed them as more social – including dinner parties, two plane trips, and Epstein hanging out at Trump’s Mar-a-lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida. As Radar reported last April, “According to an investigation by Radar, Trump was among dozens of renowned New Yorkers who knew Epstein socially but ostracized him after Palm Beach police uncovered the financiers sleazy double life,” adding that Trump “once barred child molester Jeffrey Epstein from his famed Mar-a-lago club after the presidential candidate caught him hitting on a young girl.”
Candy Michelle Johnson: I am a P.R. expert for stars like supermodel and chef Chrissy Teigen. During 2020, many stars are filming productions right in their living rooms. Check out Chrissy Teigen Teach Your Child To Cook and Sean Combs The Paper Boy. Both on Amazon KDP and Audible.com.
LETTER TO EDITOR OR COMMENTARY RE: COVID-19 & AFRICAN AMERICANS THE “SHELTER IN PLACE” ORDERS ARE DEADLY TO MANY – ESPECIALLY AFRICAN AMERICANS
By Woodrow Wilcox
African-Americans are dying of covid-19 at much higher rates than others in our country. Recently, I heard radio reports that 70% of deaths from covid-19 in Chicago are African-Americans despite the fact that African-Americans are only 30% of that city’s population. Why is this happening? I believe I know why. The “Shelter in Place” orders of various governors and mayors are DEADLY to those who live in multi-unit (apartment) buildings. Many people who live in urban areas live in multi-unit buildings. Many African-Americans in urban areas live in multi-unit buildings and often in older apartment buildings that might have less than adequate ventilation systems.
I worked in construction with my grandfather and others. I believe the high death rate is because people who “shelter in place” in a multi-unit building are sharing the air and the germs with others in the building through the ventilation system. Government started ordering “shelter in place” in the winter months. During winter months, people don’t usually open their windows because that would increase the heating bill. Thus, when there are people in the building who are sick, self-quarantined, and exhaling covid-19 germs, there would be a continuing increase in covid-19 germs in the air throughout the entire building if no one introduces fresh air to dilute the concentration of covid-19 germs. Wherever the ventilation system does not provide a constant introduction of new, fresh air and exhaust of old air, it would become a “shared air and shared germs” system. Examples of this could be apartment buildings, hotels, college dormitories, and ships at sea. I believe that is why places with many people living in multi-unit buildings are areas where the covid-19 disease and deaths are the highest.
Government officials who ordered the “shelter in place” policy failed to tell people in multi-unit buildings that they should open the windows regularly to dilute the concentration of covid-19 germs in their apartment and the building. If you are around just a few covid-19 germs, your body’s immune system might be able to fight off the disease. But if you are in a multi-unit building and breathing air with a high concentration of covid-19 germs, it is more likely that your immune system will be overwhelmed and you will get the disease. Suburbs and rural areas seem to get less covid-19 cases. People in a single-family home can easily reduce the concentration of covid-19 germs by opening a window or a door and bringing fresh air into the building. The “shelter in place” policy was tried in China, Italy, and Spain. It did not work to control the spread of covid-19. In fact, that policy lead to many deaths in urban areas in those countries. Why should we believe that the “shelter in place” policy would work in the U.S.? The President’s medical experts tell us that the rate of covid-19 cases is declining because the “shelter in place” policy is working.
I challenge that idea. I believe that cases might be declining because it is spring and with warmer weather people start opening their windows to freshen the air in their apartments. They start opening doors to go outside and enjoy the warmer weather. The opening of the doors and windows alone should reduce the concentration of covid-19 germs in buildings and thus reduce the chances of people in those buildings from getting the covid-19 disease. Instead of protecting people who live in multi-unit buildings, the “shelter in place” policy ordered by so many mayors and governors worked to kill people – especially African-Americans. Government officials should admit their errors and kill the “shelter in place” orders instead of continuing to kill people with that bad government policy.