False Flag Fatigue: Christchurch

After the unexpected loss of Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump in 2016, the power-structure in our global political landscape dramatically shifted. Those in power, who had planned for a Clinton win, had been preparing (since her loss in 2008) for her succession to Barack Obama in 2016. Barack Obama himself described Hillary Clinton’s assumed Presidency as the continuation of his legacy. When that didn’t happen, America saw a massive shift in power, shifts in global finance, and the resurgence of an old mechanism in order to combat this shifting landscape: The False Flag.

False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as if they are being carried out by other entities.

False Flags doesn’t mean people don’t die, nor do they mean they automatically do.
The most important hallmark is that the evidence and information given to explain or qualify the events to the public, do not align.

This review is not intended to convince, rather, to rationally outline some of the information without having to take on the burden of having to be convinced.

Understanding the arguments of the people analyzing evidence, is not the same thing as agreeing with their conclusions. One must remain skeptical, but should always seek the truth.

The following 4 incidents, spanning 2016-present day, have all been classified as False Flags by the general public, as well as some experts who study American covert political, social, and military operations.

  1. Orlando
  2. Vegas
  3. Parkland
  4. Christchurch

What all of these incidents have in common, first and foremost, is that the general public identified all of these incidents as false flags immediately or not too long after their occurrence.

In every instance, within days or weeks (sometimes minutes), of the event being reported or posted online, a portion of the general public researched the events, found evidence, and provided the evidence to support the claims. A common misconception is that there is a right/left bias among people who believe in False Flags. Nothing could be further from the truth. The members of the general public include every race, gender, class, age, educational level, political affiliation, and social status.

In the public domain, the ‘official’ stories or ‘narratives’ given to the public to explain the events, have been dismissed as anti-science, false, manufactured, or contain a mixture of lies and truths, which underscores evidence of the events being False Flags.

By now, America has developed 2 methods of detecting and identifying False Flags, interwoven to varying degrees.

A. Evidence exists, in the public sphere, which undermines and/or contra-indicates the event.

B. The “official” explanation, given to explain the events, can be debunked or is lacking.

This 4 part series will review these four events individually before culminating in a round up review of facts.

4. Christchurch

This is the official story according to Wikipedia:

The Christchurch mosque shootings were two consecutive terrorist mass shootings at Muslim mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, during Friday Prayer on 15 March 2019. The attacks began at the Al Noor Mosque in the suburb of Riccarton at 1:40 pm, and continued at the Linwood Islamic Centre at about 1:55 pm.

The attacks killed 50 people and injured 50 more. A 28-year-old Australian man, described in media reports as a white supremacist and part of the “alt-right“, was arrested and charged with murder. The attacks have been linked to an increase in white supremacism and alt-right extremism globally observed since the mid-2010s.

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern referred to the attacks as “one of New Zealand’s darkest days”. Politicians and world leaders condemned the attacks. It is the deadliest mass shooting in modern New Zealand history.

A. Debunkable Evidence

The gunman live-streamed the first 17 minutes of the attack on Facebook Live. Facebook claims no one reported the video. This might be because no one believed it was real. The footage was disbelieved, and that was the response.

Screen Shot 2019-03-19 at 12.49.25 PM

Update on New Zealand Official Statement
By Chris Sonderby, VP and Deputy General Counsel for Facebook

The video was viewed fewer than 200 times during the live broadcast. No users reported the video during the live broadcast. Including the views during the live broadcast, the video was viewed about 4000 times in total before being removed from Facebook.

Rather than report it, the public began to debunk it. Many things about the video did not ring true for the general public. As with the 4 False Flags reviewed in this series, there was an overly-obvious lack of blood and human carnage. With what Wikipedia lists as 100 injured -50 of which mortally- it is normal and reasonable to see blood, bullet holes, blood splatter, and the terrible carnage associated with a death event of this magnitude.


The top image, which some posts claim is from the Christchurch shooting, is actually a photograph of an actual massacre. You can clearly see the human cost stained into the carpet. This is not the Christchurch shooting. The bottom image is a screen cap from the live stream, which shows a distinct lack of blood, either pooled or splattered. No breakage, nothing. It’s simply a first person shooter view of a man shooting a gun at a pile of bodies that bear no injury, react in no way, and do not bleed.

The fact of the matter, is that the only “real” images we have of “blood” are from leaks. The live video does not show any blood. The carpet has no blood stains, whatsoever.

However, in the rehearsal videos that were leaked within days of the event, including images from different participants phones adding different points of view, lots of blood can be seen. Even in this leaked rehearsal footage, the one man who appears to be shot in the head, is shown again in a different leak, without the man pulling him up. In the phone pic leak, the “dead man” is clearly awake and resting comfortably, holding his head up, alert, and not mortally wounded in any way.


In the bottom video in the top post, you can clearly see ‘the shooter’ shooting bullet casings that disappear in mid air. They pop out of the gun normally, and then never land on anything. They simply vanish. Obviously this is not a livestream, as was specified. Livestreams cannot be edited. But edited videos can be livestreamed after they are filmed.

Screen Shot 2019-03-21 at 1.45.40 PM

This is the man from the livestream, the New Zealand Christchurch Mosque Shooter.

This is the man who was arrested and charged with the New Zealand Christchurch Mosque Shooting:

Screen Shot 2019-03-21 at 1.48.11 PM.png












Jared H. Beck from the Beck and Lee Law Firm, who brought the DNC Fraud lawsuit into the courts had this to say about this first time practice of blurring the shooter’s face.

Screen Shot 2019-03-21 at 1.50.41 PM.png


Whoever this man is, he has long hair and a goatee, and if media would not blur his face and actually show it, most likely people would feel the same as the people who also posted this online and pointed it out.

Screen Shot 2019-03-21 at 2.00.27 PM

Copies of the video made during the livestream of this event, cannot be viewed, and anyone sharing or hosting them faces several years in prison in New Zealand and have already been warned and an 18 year old has been arrested for sharing it.

Screen Shot 2019-03-22 at 8.27.36 PM

With the video being illegal, and the face of the accused being blurred, it prevents anyone from being able to analyze it, beyond what has already been exposed by the public, and from some of the people involved, who leaked their cell phone footage.

  • Where are the victims? There were 50 victims that were not mortally wounded, in addition to 50 who were. There are only 2 images in existence online representing any victim, one is a Malaysian person in a hospital bed, posted by “World of Buzz”, in Malaysia, not in New Zealand. The original Facebook post this is supposedly from, is now gone.

Screen Shot 2019-03-21 at 3.54.38 PM.png

  • The only real victim being shown on mainstream news is this Muslim boy, wheeled in a wheelchair to a funeral. Other than the fact that he is sitting in a wheelchair, he has no visible injuries. There are no other images of any victim, none. Not inside a news article, nowhere. All of the news reports focus on a photo montage of the dead, when mentioning victims, but nothing shows actual images of victims of this event, either during, just after, or in the hospital, being put into ambulances, unloaded at hospitals or in the hospital.


B. Suspicious Evidence


At the time, this didn’t just shock some Americans, this shocked plenty of New Zealanders who made their feelings known quite loudly at the time.

The Foundation is currently under investigation by the FBI over the way it obtained donations while Hillary Clinton was US Secretary of State – the same period in which the New Zealand Government began giving the initiative money.

Taxpayers deserve confidence that aid commitments are made to help the world’s poor, not to win favours with foreign politicians.

Click here to sign the Petition to end taxfund payments to The Clinton Foundation.

Top Clinton aide John Podesta describes Australian politics as a self-referential “circular firing squad” and warns that the country needs to address pressing issues around climate change and artificial intelligence, if it is to resist the global rise of far-right populism.

Edwina Pickles/John PodestaScreen Shot 2019-03-21 at 1.12.36 PM

Screen Shot 2019-03-19 at 11.16.25 AM

A group of 28 MSD students recently traveled to New Zealand, where they not only spread their ideas about gun law reform but also absorbed new strategies for pursuing activism more generally. Over seven days in late July, the students traversed the country, learning at every stage how activism can help repair communities shaken by tragedy.



Part 1: Orlando


One thought on “False Flag Fatigue: Christchurch”